Episode 0Feb 10, 2026· 7:43

Understanding My Love Languages in Real Life

Show notes from the creator
I break down the five love languages and share how I realized I don’t have just one or two, but a clear top three. I talk through real examples, how I figured out the order, and why certain expressions matter more to me than others. This clarity has changed how I show up in dating and relationships. Send us Fan Mail Email CT: [email protected] Connect on social: @TheMindfulSPX Check out our website: TheMindfulSPX.com
Listen on RSS
About this episode
CT Kaupp covers Gary Chapman's five love languages — physical touch, words of affirmation, quality time, acts of service, gift giving — and addresses the common misconception that partners must share the same love language. He argues that understanding a partner's language matters more than matching it. He then describes a personal exercise he used to rank his own top three (quality time, words of affirmation,…
Listener reactions
💡0
🤝0
🔥0
😄0
0 reactions

Share your reaction

Pick how this episode landed — then leave a public review or a private note to the host.

You
Your name will appear with your review
0/300 Visible to everyone
Sign in to leave feedback
Notable quotes

"some regard, but it's more so important that you understand what the other person's love language is and vice versa. So if somebody's love language is quality time and you're gone all of the time, work or other, you know, whatever the reason is, but you're, but you're not present, then everything else that you do is not going to land to them as love. And this is a very important distinction of just, just because you like one style doesn't mean that the other person has to also. Again, it's just the understanding that you both have so that you know where to meet each other. We talk about the importance of communication, obviously, in relationships. To me, love language is just an extension of that communication."

CT Kaupp

"at all. If I get words of affirmation, but don't give physical touch or quality time, then that feels very transactional. That just feels like you're so you're saying nice things without any substance behind it. So it it again, yeah,"

CT Kaupp

"and I will be deeply fulfilled by that connection. Let me say it again, we can be watching freaking paint dry and I am fulfilled by that connection."

CT Kaupp

Episode transcript

3 chapters — tap to expand the full text

Mentioned in this episode
personGary Chapman
Author whose book and work on the five love languages is the foundation of the episode's discussion.
bookThe Five Love Languages
Gary Chapman's book, first released in 1992, which CT references as the source of the five love languages framework discussed throughout the episode.
Key themes
Five love languages overview
CT walks through each of Gary Chapman's five love languages — physical touch, words of affirmation, quality time, acts of service, and gift giving — describing what each looks like in everyday situations.
Partners don't have to share the same love language
CT describes a misconception he held early on — that both people in a relationship need the same love language — and argues that understanding your partner's language matters more than matching it.
Love languages as an extension of communication
CT frames love languages not as a separate concept but as another layer of relationship communication — a way of expressing how you want love to be communicated and received.
Adapting to your partner's love language even if it's not yours
CT shares that he's not a gift giver or acts of service person, but if a partner values those, he'll go buy the coaster or keychain they mentioned — because he understands what makes them feel loved.
What to do when you score evenly across multiple love languages
CT describes scoring 33% each on quality time, physical touch, and words of affirmation across multiple attempts at the quiz, which left him confused by the book's emphasis on a single primary language.
CT's personal exercise to rank his own love languages
CT describes laying his three tied love languages on paper and asking himself what happens when he has one but not the others — using that to figure out which one he actually needs most.
Physical touch without the others feels empty
CT reflects that if he has physical touch but no words of affirmation or quality time, it doesn't fill his cup at all — it doesn't register as love.
Words of affirmation alone feel transactional
CT says that receiving words of affirmation without physical touch or quality time feels fake and transactional — like someone is saying nice things without any substance behind them.
Quality time as CT's number one need
CT concludes from his own exercise that quality time is his top love language — to the point where sitting silently watching paint dry with someone would leave him deeply fulfilled.