Episode 0May 6, 2026· 9:13

Are You Actually Choosing Them…or Just Used to Being With Them?

Show notes from the creator
Some relationships don’t feel bad… but they don’t feel alive either. In this episode, we explore the difference between familiarity and real connection, and why it’s so easy to confuse the two. If you’ve ever found yourself in that “it’s good” or “it’s fine… I guess” territory, I share a simple question that brings instant clarity. Send us Fan Mail Email CT: [email protected] Connect on social: @TheMindfulSPX Check out our website: TheMindfulSPX.com
Listen on RSS
About this episode
Short solo episode from CT Kaupp on the Securely You podcast exploring the difference between genuine romantic attraction and relationship inertia — staying with someone out of familiarity, routine, and comfort rather than active choice. CT introduces a 'midnight marriage question' (marry them tonight or never see them again) as a way to break out of neutral headspace, argues that neutral is effectively a no, and…
Listener reactions
💡0
🤝0
🔥0
😄0
0 reactions

Share your reaction

Pick how this episode landed — then leave a public review or a private note to the host.

You
Your name will appear with your review
0/300 Visible to everyone
Sign in to leave feedback
Notable quotes

"actually know the difference between being into someone"

CT Kaupp

"with with that"

CT Kaupp

"I think is"

CT Kaupp

"from now, you're gonna stay in that relationship."

CT Kaupp

"not actively choosing each other. You're just continuing"

CT Kaupp

Episode transcript

6 chapters — tap to expand the full text

Mentioned in this episode
companyNetflix
CT uses Netflix as an example of the kind of passive, going-through-the-motions routine that characterizes being used to someone rather than genuinely excited by them.
Key themes
Familiarity mistaken for connection
CT describes how shared routines and rituals can make 'being used to someone' look almost identical to genuinely being into them, and how people start confusing the two without realizing it.
The 'aliveness' feeling
CT uses the word 'aliveness' to describe the specific quality of mutual excitement and energy he thinks distinguishes real attraction from comfortable routine.
Neutral means no
CT argues that feeling neutral about a relationship is effectively a no, framing it as a five out of ten — something nobody actually wants, especially not in a marriage.
The midnight marriage question
CT shares a forced-choice thought experiment he posed to a friend a decade ago — marry this person tonight or never see them again — as a way to cut through ambivalence and surface a gut answer.
Dating someone on their potential
CT cautions against indefinitely staying with someone because of what they could become, saying it sets a bad precedent and can drag on for six weeks, six months, or six years.
Giving yourself a private deadline
CT suggests privately setting a personal deadline — a month, 45 days, whatever feels right — to hold yourself accountable to actually evaluating whether something out of alignment in the relationship changes.
Good on paper vs. deeply fulfilling
CT distinguishes between a partner who looks great on paper and one your family loves, versus a connection that's actually deeply fulfilling on the levels that matter specifically to you.
Not letting outside opinions define what matters
CT points out that what counts as important in a relationship is personal — not defined by neighbors, friends, or social media — and warns against sacrificing your own needs to meet someone else's checklist.
Active choosing vs. just continuing
CT closes by naming the core distinction of the episode: the difference between actively choosing each other and simply continuing to see each other out of inertia.